Konami's strategy is easier, they make decks more consistent.įor instance, the odds of Red-Eyes to open with either Red-Eyes Fusion or with Red-Eyes Insight assuming they run 3 copies of each AND they go first (so only 4 cards in hand) is almost 80%. You do realice how awfully complicated it would be to program certain cards to be more likely to be drawn than others and to keep that list updated for the current selling decks. ||eXz|| _sNTx // 構文 eredeti hozzászólása:This. they make decks good so everyone buys it. they have to make profit because the game is free. Its a free to play game so its not crazy to assume there are certain decks and cards that just show up at a higher rate because they forced it to get more cash. now konami is gonna lock cyber dragon and cyber twin dragon is a new structure deck, and its gonna be just like red eyes and neos. same with every other deck they forced into the meta like fur hire where they always had beat first to search for wiz. even when limited the first time they always were able to search or open up on the first turn. Remember amazoness princess, and onslaught. konami has always made it so that certain cards just end up in your hand more than others. I'm just wondering if they cringe at the superstitious bs they wrote if they ever come back to read this in the future.īruh your delusional. I think the main problem ppl have is this, they think that just bc 20 ppl open up with a similiar hand against them (in a 20 cards deck format with 3 copies of all mandatory cards) that they always open this hand, they don't see the other 40 duels where they bricked before, neither do they care, it's just more convenient to say something is rigged, it's the TCG equivalent to he's cheating, that doesn't count, from FPS games, it's just there to comfort themselfes into believing they did nothing wrong, that there is absolutely nothing they could have done to prevent this and to direct some anger towards something that is completely out of their hands. PTW decks are not the be all and end all of Duel Links, there are some far stronger F2P decks that smash them to pieces, Six Samurai for example. MagmaticMike eredeti hozzászólása:^ This is total BS, I play red eyes and believe me, you do NOT always draw red eyes fusion, its likely to get on the first turn sure thanks to red eyes insight but not always and as for the "paired with bad match ups" nonsense, how does that work? If the game was rigged that way then would everyone always be paired with their bad match up? Noone would progress if this were the case, you have had a bout of bad luck nothing more, nothing less. no matter what you do your gonna get forced to lose.ĭont even try to play ranked seriously its a joke. In conclusion this game is an absolute rigged. and im still getting matched up against counters. Then i switched back to using the old deck. but out of nowhere the game matches me up with mirror matches and other slow player burn decks as soon as i try? keep in mind i havent faced lava golem not even ONCE my whole climb through platinum. 10 times in a row i faced mirror matches with wevil lava golem. i started to play lava golem ammazon burn. i started facing opponents using different wacky decks that were not consistent at all, and seems to be perfect counters to what i had conveniently. no problem, but then i started to plateau. So i was playing a gravekeeper necrovally anti meta deck. Heres what happend and heres what i found. What made me want to test this is because of recent duels ive been getting matched up against. This is about how the game forces you to play against unfavorable opponents to make you lose. people already know that drawing and starting hands are rigged in favor of rarity in cards.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |